1952 Porsche 356 vs. 1983 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 1983 Skoda Rapid R is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 1,289 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Skoda Rapid R is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Skoda Rapid R weights approximately 50 kg more than 1952 Porsche 356.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Porsche 356 | 1983 Skoda Rapid R | |
| Make | Porsche | Skoda |
| Model | 356 | Rapid R |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1287 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 62 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 990 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 47 L |
