1952 Porsche 356 vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Porsche 356 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Clio (78 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1952 Porsche 356. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1952 Porsche 356. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Renault Clio weights approximately 169 kg more than 1952 Porsche 356. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Porsche 356 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Porsche 356. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Porsche 356 | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | Porsche | Renault |
Model | 356 | Clio |
Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 50 L |