1952 Porsche 356 vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 212 more horse power than 1952 Porsche 356. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1952 Porsche 356.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1952 Porsche 356 has manual transmission. 1952 Porsche 356 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Porsche 356 | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Porsche | Jaguar |
Model | 356 | XF |
Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 271 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 70 L |