1952 Renault Fregate vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Renault Fregate. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Renault Fregate would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 721 kg more than 1952 Renault Fregate.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Renault Fregate. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Renault Fregate | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Fregate | Tundra |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 188 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 2016 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3270 mm |