1952 Renault Fregate vs. 2009 Audi TT
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Renault Fregate. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Renault Fregate would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Renault Fregate is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi TT weights approximately 20 kg more than 1952 Renault Fregate.
Because 1952 Renault Fregate is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Renault Fregate. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Audi TT has automatic transmission and 1952 Renault Fregate has manual transmission. 1952 Renault Fregate will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi TT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Renault Fregate | 2009 Audi TT | |
Make | Renault | Audi |
Model | Fregate | TT |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1315 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2470 mm |