1952 Renault Fregate vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Renault Fregate. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Renault Fregate would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 462 kg more than 1952 Renault Fregate.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1952 Renault Fregate has manual transmission. 1952 Renault Fregate will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Renault Fregate | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Renault | Cadillac |
Model | Fregate | CTS |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 304 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1757 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2880 mm |