1952 Renault Juva vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Renault Clio (106 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1952 Renault Juva. (24 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1952 Renault Juva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Clio weights approximately 185 kg more than 1952 Renault Juva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Renault Juva | 1999 Renault Clio | |
Make | Renault | Renault |
Model | Juva | Clio |
Year Released | 1952 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1003 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2480 mm |