1952 Riley RM A vs. 1948 Studebaker Commander
To start off, 1952 Riley RM A is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 3,703 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Studebaker Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Studebaker Commander weights approximately 223 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Riley RM A | 1948 Studebaker Commander | |
Make | Riley | Studebaker |
Model | RM A | Commander |
Year Released | 1952 | 1948 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 3703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1458 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3030 mm |