1952 Riley RM A vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1963 Triumph 2000 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Riley RM A weights approximately 40 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Riley RM A | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Riley | Triumph |
Model | RM A | 2000 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 130 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2700 mm |