1952 Riley RM A vs. 1999 Subaru Forester
To start off, 1999 Subaru Forester is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Subaru Forester weights approximately 150 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Because 1999 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Subaru Forester has automatic transmission and 1952 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1952 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Subaru Forester will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Riley RM A | 1999 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Riley | Subaru |
Model | RM A | Forester |
Year Released | 1952 | 1999 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2530 mm |