1952 Riley RM A vs. 2000 Subaru Pleo
To start off, 2000 Subaru Pleo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Riley RM A weights approximately 465 kg more than 2000 Subaru Pleo.
Because 2000 Subaru Pleo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Subaru Pleo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Riley RM A | 2000 Subaru Pleo | |
Make | Riley | Subaru |
Model | RM A | Pleo |
Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1580 mm |