1952 Riley RM A vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2002 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 365 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Because 2002 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Riley RM A | 2002 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Riley | Nissan |
| Model | RM A | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2184 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 112 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2540 mm |
