1952 Riley RM A vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2002 Volvo S60 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo S60 weights approximately 216 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Because 2002 Volvo S60 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Volvo S60 has automatic transmission and 1952 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1952 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Volvo S60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Riley RM A | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Riley | Volvo |
Model | RM A | S60 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 295 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2720 mm |