1952 Riley RM A vs. 2004 Audi S3
To start off, 2004 Audi S3 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,779 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Audi S3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi S3 weights approximately 188 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Because 2004 Audi S3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi S3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Riley RM A | 2004 Audi S3 | |
| Make | Riley | Audi |
| Model | RM A | S3 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1779 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 222 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1423 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2530 mm |
