1952 Riley RM A vs. 2006 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2006 Subaru Outback is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,458 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Subaru Outback weights approximately 314 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Because 2006 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Riley RM A | 2006 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Riley | Subaru |
| Model | RM A | Outback |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2458 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 250 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1549 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2680 mm |
