1952 Riley RM A vs. 2007 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2007 Toyota RunX is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Toyota RunX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Riley RM A weights approximately 101 kg more than 2007 Toyota RunX.
Because 1952 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Toyota RunX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Riley RM A | 2007 Toyota RunX | |
Make | Riley | Toyota |
Model | RM A | RunX |
Year Released | 1952 | 2007 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 134 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2610 mm |