1952 Riley RM A vs. 2010 BMW 325
To start off, 2010 BMW 325 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 BMW 325 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW 325 weights approximately 245 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Riley RM A | 2010 BMW 325 | |
Make | Riley | BMW |
Model | RM A | 325 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2730 mm |