1952 Riley RM A vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford E-350 weights approximately 261 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Because 1952 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Riley RM A | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Riley | Ford |
| Model | RM A | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 171 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1496 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4437 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1725 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2619 mm |
