1952 Riley RM A vs. 2010 Hummer H3
To start off, 2010 Hummer H3 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,653 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Hummer H3 weights approximately 996 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Because 2010 Hummer H3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Hummer H3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Hummer H3 has automatic transmission and 1952 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1952 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Hummer H3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Riley RM A | 2010 Hummer H3 | |
| Make | Riley | Hummer |
| Model | RM A | H3 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 3653 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 243 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 2231 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 2000 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2850 mm |
