1952 Riley RM A vs. 2011 Lancia Voyager
To start off, 2011 Lancia Voyager is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,777 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Lancia Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Lancia Voyager weights approximately 875 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Because 1952 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Lancia Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Lancia Voyager has automatic transmission and 1952 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1952 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Lancia Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Riley RM A | 2011 Lancia Voyager | |
Make | Riley | Lancia |
Model | RM A | Voyager |
Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2777 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 2110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5151 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1999 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3078 mm |