1952 Riley RM A vs. 2012 Mazda 5
To start off, 2012 Mazda 5 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 5 weights approximately 235 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Because 1952 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Riley RM A | 2012 Mazda 5 | |
| Make | Riley | Mazda |
| Model | RM A | 5 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 113 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4585 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1615 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2751 mm |
