1952 Riley RM A vs. 2012 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2012 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1515 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Because 2012 Toyota Sequoia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Sequoia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Toyota Sequoia has automatic transmission and 1952 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1952 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Toyota Sequoia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Riley RM A | 2012 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Riley | Toyota |
Model | RM A | Sequoia |
Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 381 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 2750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1956 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3099 mm |