1952 Riley RM A vs. 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1449 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Because 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Riley RM A | 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
Make | Riley | Chevrolet |
Model | RM A | Tahoe |
Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 327 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 2684 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2007 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1953 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2946 mm |