1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1966 Suzuki Fronte is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Suzuki |
Model | Phantom | Fronte |
Year Released | 1952 | 1966 |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 35 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3690 mm | 2250 mm |