1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom vs. 2004 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2004 Mazda AZ is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 2004 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Mazda AZ has automatic transmission and 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom has manual transmission. 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mazda AZ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom | 2004 Mazda AZ | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Mazda |
| Model | Phantom | AZ |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3690 mm | 2370 mm |
