1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 2013 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Jeep |
| Model | Phantom | Compass |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1811 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3690 mm | 2634 mm |
