1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn vs. 2011 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2011 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn would be higher. At 4,566 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn weights approximately 793 kg more than 2011 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn | 2011 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Volkswagen |
Model | Silver Dawn | Polo |
Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4566 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 69 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 139 km/hour | 165 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1860 kg | 1067 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1682 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1462 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2470 mm |