1952 Rover P4 vs. 1995 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1995 Toyota Celica is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,101 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Toyota Celica (114 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1952 Rover P4. (75 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1952 Rover P4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Rover P4 weights approximately 295 kg more than 1995 Toyota Celica.
Because 1952 Rover P4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Rover P4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Toyota Celica (154 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Rover P4. (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1995 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Rover P4.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Rover P4 | 1995 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Rover | Toyota |
Model | P4 | Celica |
Year Released | 1952 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2101 cc | 1762 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65.2 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 105 mm | 78 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1760 mm |