1952 Saab 92 vs. 1981 Suzuki Cervo
To start off, 1981 Suzuki Cervo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Saab 92 would be higher. At 764 cc (2 cylinders), 1952 Saab 92 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Suzuki Cervo (26 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1952 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Suzuki Cervo should accelerate faster than 1952 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Saab 92 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1981 Suzuki Cervo.
Because 1981 Suzuki Cervo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Suzuki Cervo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Saab 92 | 1981 Suzuki Cervo | |
| Make | Saab | Suzuki |
| Model | 92 | Cervo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 764 cc | 539 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 535 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 3200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1220 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2040 mm |
