1952 Saab 92 vs. 1996 Seat Alhambra
To start off, 1996 Seat Alhambra is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Seat Alhambra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Seat Alhambra (114 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1952 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Seat Alhambra should accelerate faster than 1952 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Seat Alhambra weights approximately 970 kg more than 1952 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Saab 92 | 1996 Seat Alhambra | |
Make | Saab | Seat |
Model | 92 | Alhambra |
Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 764 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 1775 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2830 mm |