1952 Saab 92 vs. 2003 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Saab 92 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 915 kg more than 1952 Saab 92.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Saab 92. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Saab 92 | 2003 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Saab | Ford |
| Model | 92 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 764 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3010 mm |
