1952 Saab 92 vs. 2003 Skoda Octavia
To start off, 2003 Skoda Octavia is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,594 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Skoda Octavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Skoda Octavia (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1952 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Skoda Octavia should accelerate faster than 1952 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Skoda Octavia weights approximately 475 kg more than 1952 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Saab 92 | 2003 Skoda Octavia | |
Make | Saab | Skoda |
Model | 92 | Octavia |
Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 764 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2520 mm |