1952 Saab 92 vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,422 cc (3 cylinders), 2005 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volkswagen Polo (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1952 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1952 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 551 kg more than 1952 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Saab 92 | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Saab | Volkswagen |
| Model | 92 | Polo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 764 cc | 1422 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 1356 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2470 mm |
