1952 Saab 92 vs. 2008 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Saab 92 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (307 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 283 more horse power than 1952 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1952 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 989 kg more than 1952 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Saab 92 | 2008 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Saab | Cadillac |
Model | 92 | CTS |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 764 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 307 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 1794 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2890 mm |