1952 Skoda 1200 vs. 2010 Toyota Venza
To start off, 2010 Toyota Venza is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Skoda 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Skoda 1200 would be higher. At 3,456 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Venza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Venza (269 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 1952 Skoda 1200. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Venza should accelerate faster than 1952 Skoda 1200.
Because 2010 Toyota Venza is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Skoda 1200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Venza will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Venza (334 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Skoda 1200. (75 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Venza will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Skoda 1200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Skoda 1200 | 2010 Toyota Venza | |
| Make | Skoda | Toyota |
| Model | 1200 | Venza |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1221 cc | 3456 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 269 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 75 Nm | 334 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2780 mm |
