1952 Skoda 1200 vs. 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet

To start off, 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Skoda 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Skoda 1200 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 1952 Skoda 1200. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet should accelerate faster than 1952 Skoda 1200.

Because 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Skoda 1200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet (336 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Skoda 1200. (75 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Skoda 1200.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Skoda 1200 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet
Make Skoda Nissan
Model 1200 Murano CrossCabriolet
Year Released 1952 2011
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1221 cc 3500 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 35 HP 265 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 75 Nm 336 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear AWD
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Length 4510 mm 4829 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1892 mm
Vehicle Height 1660 mm 1681 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 2824 mm