1952 Skoda 1200 vs. 2012 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC60 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Skoda 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Skoda 1200 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 911 kg more than 1952 Skoda 1200.
Because 2012 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Skoda 1200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Skoda 1200 | 2012 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Skoda | Volvo |
| Model | 1200 | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1221 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1921 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1712 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2748 mm |
