1952 Talbot Baby vs. 1969 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1969 Zastava 1500 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Talbot Baby (108 HP) has 55 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Talbot Baby should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Baby weights approximately 670 kg more than 1969 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Talbot Baby | 1969 Zastava 1500 | |
| Make | Talbot | Zastava |
| Model | Baby | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 2690 cc | 1294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 53 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2430 mm |
