1952 Talbot Baby vs. 1998 Volvo S80
To start off, 1998 Volvo S80 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Volvo S80 (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1952 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 1952 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Volvo S80 weights approximately 4 kg more than 1952 Talbot Baby. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Talbot Baby | 1998 Volvo S80 | |
| Make | Talbot | Volvo |
| Model | Baby | S80 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1998 |
| Engine Size | 2690 cc | 2461 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1654 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2670 mm |
