1952 Talbot Baby vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Holden Epica is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1952 Talbot Baby. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1952 Talbot Baby.
Because 1952 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Talbot Baby | 2008 Holden Epica | |
Make | Talbot | Holden |
Model | Baby | Epica |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 2690 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2700 mm |