1952 Talbot Baby vs. 2010 Citroen C3
To start off, 2010 Citroen C3 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Talbot Baby (108 HP) has 36 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C3. (72 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Talbot Baby should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Baby weights approximately 439 kg more than 2010 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Talbot Baby | 2010 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Talbot | Citroen |
Model | Baby | C3 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 2690 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 72 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1211 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2470 mm |