1952 Talbot Baby vs. 2011 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2011 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mercedes-Benz C (454 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 346 more horse power than 1952 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1952 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 145 kg more than 1952 Talbot Baby. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Talbot Baby | 2011 Mercedes-Benz C | |
| Make | Talbot | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Baby | C |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 2690 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 454 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1795 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4606 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1796 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2760 mm |
