1952 Talbot Baby vs. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu (169 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1952 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1952 Talbot Baby.
Because 1952 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Talbot Baby | 2012 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | Talbot | Chevrolet |
| Model | Baby | Malibu |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 2690 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 169 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4872 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2852 mm |
