1952 Talbot Saoutchik vs. 2010 Audi A4
To start off, 2010 Audi A4 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Saoutchik would be higher. At 4,480 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A4 (211 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. (169 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik weights approximately 200 kg more than 2010 Audi A4.
Because 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Talbot Saoutchik | 2010 Audi A4 | |
| Make | Talbot | Audi |
| Model | Saoutchik | A4 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 4480 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 169 HP | 211 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1600 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2809 mm |
