1952 Talbot Saoutchik vs. 2010 Kia Rio
To start off, 2010 Kia Rio is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Saoutchik would be higher. At 4,480 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Talbot Saoutchik (169 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2010 Kia Rio. (110 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Talbot Saoutchik should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Rio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik weights approximately 727 kg more than 2010 Kia Rio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Rio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Talbot Saoutchik | 2010 Kia Rio | |
| Make | Talbot | Kia |
| Model | Saoutchik | Rio |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 4480 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 169 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1073 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2499 mm |
