1952 Talbot Saoutchik vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz A
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz A is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Saoutchik would be higher. At 4,480 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Talbot Saoutchik (169 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2010 Mercedes-Benz A. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Talbot Saoutchik should accelerate faster than 2010 Mercedes-Benz A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercedes-Benz A weights approximately 1030 kg more than 1952 Talbot Saoutchik.
Because 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz A, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Talbot Saoutchik | 2010 Mercedes-Benz A | |
| Make | Talbot | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Saoutchik | A |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 4480 cc | 1989 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 169 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 2830 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2570 mm |
