1952 Talbot Saoutchik vs. 2011 Citroen C3
To start off, 2011 Citroen C3 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Saoutchik would be higher. At 4,480 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Talbot Saoutchik (169 HP) has 97 more horse power than 2011 Citroen C3. (72 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Talbot Saoutchik should accelerate faster than 2011 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik weights approximately 589 kg more than 2011 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Talbot Saoutchik | 2011 Citroen C3 | |
| Make | Talbot | Citroen |
| Model | Saoutchik | C3 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 4480 cc | 1360 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 169 HP | 72 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1211 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2470 mm |
