1952 Talbot Saoutchik vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Saoutchik would be higher. At 4,480 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. (169 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 84 kg more than 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Talbot Saoutchik | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Talbot | Jaguar |
Model | Saoutchik | XJ |
Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 4480 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1884 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 3032 mm |