1952 Toyota SA vs. 2009 Volvo V50
To start off, 2009 Volvo V50 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Toyota SA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Toyota SA would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo V50 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1952 Toyota SA. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 1952 Toyota SA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volvo V50 weights approximately 428 kg more than 1952 Toyota SA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Toyota SA | 2009 Volvo V50 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | SA | V50 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 993 cc | 2521 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 227 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1598 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2650 mm |
