1952 Toyota SA vs. 2010 Citroen C3
To start off, 2010 Citroen C3 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Toyota SA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Toyota SA would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C3 (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1952 Toyota SA. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1952 Toyota SA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Citroen C3 weights approximately 82 kg more than 1952 Toyota SA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Toyota SA | 2010 Citroen C3 | |
| Make | Toyota | Citroen |
| Model | SA | C3 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 993 cc | 1587 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1252 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2470 mm |
